Flagship 02 Revenue operations
Marketing Revenue Assurance
Reconcile what ad platforms report with what the CRM received and what finance actually collected. Agents interpret the evidence. Deterministic controls own the math.
Ready for a reconciled run
Choose a failure pattern.
Twelve evaluated replay cases cover delivery gaps, duplicate leads, attribution loss, funnel leakage, cash collection, stale data, and unsafe multi-failure states.
Campaign assurance run
The council has not reported a finding.
pending
Replay mode
Cross-system reconciliation
| Channel | Spend | Platform leads | CRM leads | Qualified | Booked | Collected | Freshness |
|---|
Prioritized incidents
Agent execution
Claim register
Measurement owner review
The system can draft a recovery plan, but it cannot act on a client system.
Inspect typed run record
The assurance service did not return a valid run.
Why this is an assurance system, not another dashboard.
It persists normalized evidence, runs bounded specialists through an explicit graph, separates arithmetic from interpretation, records a tamper-evident audit trail, and stops at a named human gate.
Golden failure cases
Every expected top finding is evaluated before release.
Governed specialists
Each agent has one decision responsibility and a visible trace.
API assertions
The Docker and Postgres journey verifies policy, audit, and approval behavior.
External mutations
Public and pilot runs remain read-only until a separate integration is approved.
Python 3.12Runtime and rules
FastAPITyped REST control plane
LangGraphStateful orchestration
PostgreSQLEvidence and checkpoints
OpenTelemetryTrace context
- CTRDockerReproducible runtime
- APIPostmanContract journey